It’s not about information

by | Sep 11, 2008


At today’s DNI Open Source conference here in Washington, we kicked off with a keynote speech from Glenn Gaffney.

Gaffney’s job is to co-ordinate the intelligence collection efforts of the US’s patchwork of 16  agencies and he was fulsome in his endorsement of the use of open source intelligence.

“We don’t own the technological playing field in the way we once did,” he argued. Information is cheaper and barriers to entry are lower. The challenge is to ‘leverage’ new technologies to deliver strategic advantage for the US.

In other words, the US government needs to go open source – or it will miss out on the growing wealth of information offered by a multi-connected, always on world.

Gaffney’s talk went down well – at least on Twitter, with reviews positive in the back channel. “He gets it,” was the geek consensus, as Gaffney urged an older generation to embrace the new approach or give way to the mash-up generation.

But Gaffney only took me so far. As you’d expect from an intelligence gatherer, his approach was very information-centric. For him, open source means more data to sort through, which should (if all goes right) produce a greater chance of “discovering and discerning truth and using it for the safety and security of our citizenry.”

In Gaffney’s talk, I heard echoes of an old command and control paradigm (which I discussed in a recent talk at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Services). At the heart of this paradigm is the assumption that if leaders can be given the right information, they will be able to manage away the instabilities of our globalised societies.

But there’s another way of looking at open source – as a novel form of distributed organisation and production enabled by cheaper, faster and more pervasive communication.

This poses a much more substantial challenge to the status quo. It’s not simply about a quantitative shift in the availability of information – but about qualitative changes in social organisation.

Understanding those qualitative changes is – or should be – the fundamental task of open source intelligence gathering.

Author

  • David Steven is a senior fellow at the UN Foundation and at New York University, where he founded the Global Partnership to End Violence against Children and the Pathfinders for Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies, a multi-stakeholder partnership to deliver the SDG targets for preventing all forms of violence, strengthening governance, and promoting justice and inclusion. He was lead author for the ministerial Task Force on Justice for All and senior external adviser for the UN-World Bank flagship study on prevention, Pathways for Peace. He is a former senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and co-author of The Risk Pivot: Great Powers, International Security, and the Energy Revolution (Brookings Institution Press, 2014). In 2001, he helped develop and launch the UK’s network of climate diplomats. David lives in and works from Pisa, Italy.


More from Global Dashboard

Let’s make climate a culture war!

Let’s make climate a culture war!

If the politics of climate change end up polarised, is that so bad?  No – it’s disastrous. Or so I’ve long thought. Look at the US – where climate is even more polarised than abortion. Result: decades of flip flopping. Ambition under Clinton; reversal...