Flattering crap banks

by | Jan 14, 2009


According to the Telegraph, the government is considering setting up a ‘bad bank’ to take on the toxic assets that continue to drag down the UK’s financial sector.

One option is for the government to ‘buy’ all their crap at some unspecified price. Sounds like a good deal, no?

Well actually: no. Not if you’re a British bank. The problem, you see, is that this would make you own up to how bad things really are. And that would never do.

As the Telegraph report, “if banks have not written down the value of their assets aggressively enough, they may have to suddenly crystalise new losses when assets are sold to the Government.”

I remember when it was OK to feel smug as the Japanese suffered through a decade in which their ‘zombie banks’ refused to own up to the extent of their losses (see this post for more).

Now, it seems, we’re in the same position. Simply shovelling money at our financial overlords/parasites is not enough – we have to make them feel good about themselves, however badly they’ve screwed up…

Author

  • David Steven is a senior fellow at the UN Foundation and at New York University, where he founded the Global Partnership to End Violence against Children and the Pathfinders for Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies, a multi-stakeholder partnership to deliver the SDG targets for preventing all forms of violence, strengthening governance, and promoting justice and inclusion. He was lead author for the ministerial Task Force on Justice for All and senior external adviser for the UN-World Bank flagship study on prevention, Pathways for Peace. He is a former senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and co-author of The Risk Pivot: Great Powers, International Security, and the Energy Revolution (Brookings Institution Press, 2014). In 2001, he helped develop and launch the UK’s network of climate diplomats. David lives in and works from Pisa, Italy.


More from Global Dashboard

Let’s make climate a culture war!

Let’s make climate a culture war!

If the politics of climate change end up polarised, is that so bad?  No – it’s disastrous. Or so I’ve long thought. Look at the US – where climate is even more polarised than abortion. Result: decades of flip flopping. Ambition under Clinton; reversal...