Miliband’s intentions

by | Jul 30, 2008



Even before his refusal to rule himself out of any leadership bid on the way to and during his press conference with the Italian Foreign Minister this afternoon (see above), the UK political blogosphere was unanimous about how to interpret David Miliband’s op-ed in the Guardian this morning.

Here, for instance, is Jim Pickard on the FT’s Westminster blog:

Those outside the Westminster village may be bemused that an op-ed (today’s Guardian) on Labour’s future could be seen as a statement of leadership intent. David Miliband’s language is carefully coded.

No such doubts exist here though. There are the omissions (no mention of Gordon Brown), the timing (he could have kept his head low) and the criticisms (he says Labour could have done more to improve the NHS).

Sam Coates on Red Box at The Times:

The intention of David Miliband’s Guardian article was to cause mischief while Brown is weak. Once decoded, Miliband was sending two clear messages. Firstly, that things need to change. Secondly that he is waiting in the wings … Having ducked out of a leadership contest last year, the biggest danger for Miliband now is that he’s seen to dither – again.

And Nick Robinson at the BBC:

Consider the choices that faced the foreign secretary at a time when there is furious speculation about a challenge to Gordon Brown. Firstly he could have called for that speculation to stop and for people to fall in behind the leader. He did no such thing. Indeed Gordon Brown is not even mentioned in his article. Secondly he could have said nothing at all and simply gone on holiday. But oh no, he chose a third option. To set out the way forward for the party without doing anything to prop up his leader’s position.

Meanwhile, in this evening’s Standard, an ally of the PM (whom Guido Fawkes assumes to be Damian McBride) has this to say:

I think MPs will be appalled. David Miliband has shown himself to be not only disloyal but also self-serving. People at least thought he was a serious figure and a grown-up politician but by allowing his head to be turned by this leadership nonsense, he has revealed a surprising lack of judgment and maturity.

Nick Robinson, though, reckons that

…the foreign secretary has no intention of trying to bring [Gordon Brown] down. On the other hand he does want to make it clear that in this leadership contest – if there is ever one – he will not hesitate, he is ready for the fight. And he will represent the candidate promising change.


  • Alex Evans

    Alex Evans is founder of the Collective Psychology Project, which explores how we can use psychology to reduce political tribalism and polarisation, a senior fellow at New York University, and author of The Myth Gap: What Happens When Evidence and Arguments Aren’t Enough? (Penguin, 2017). He is a former Campaign Director of the 50 million member global citizen’s movement Avaaz, special adviser to two UK Cabinet Ministers, climate expert in the UN Secretary-General’s office, and was Research Director for the Business Commission on Sustainable Development. He was part of Ethiopia’s delegation to the Paris climate summit and has consulted for Oxfam, WWF UK, the UK Cabinet Office and US State Department. Alex lives with his wife and two children in Yorkshire.

More from Global Dashboard

Justice for All and the Economic Crisis

Justice for All and the Economic Crisis

As COVID-19 plunges the world into its most serious economic crisis for a century, a surge in demand for justice is inevitable. Businesses face bankruptcy – and whole industries may be insolvent. Similar pain is being felt in the public and non-profit sectors....

Who Speaks for the Global South Recipients of Aid?

Who Speaks for the Global South Recipients of Aid?

The murder of George Floyd and the resurfacing of the Black Lives Matter movement has led to heightened discussions on race in the international development sector. Aid practitioners in the North have not only condemned the systemic racism that they (suddenly) now see...