-
Pages
Authors
Topics
- Africa (81)
- Asia (95)
- Asia Pacific (21)
- Cities (35)
- Climate Change (162)
- Communication (153)
- Conflict and security (241)
- Cooperation and coherence (143)
- Development (112)
- Europe (142)
- Food prices (95)
- Global economy (157)
- Influence (162)
- Latin America (1)
- Leadership (117)
- Maps (20)
- Middle East (125)
- Networks (87)
- News (220)
- Off topic (67)
- Public diplomacy (91)
- Religion in politics (28)
- Resilience (113)
- Russia (29)
- Scarcity (151)
- Technology (59)
- Terrorism (102)
- UK politics (161)
- US politics (240)
- What we're reading (2)
- What we're watching (1)
Archives
Reading List- Noah Millman on ratings agencies
- Willem Buiter: Can the US economy afford a Keynesian stimulus?
- Make Architects' zero carbon scheme for Greenwich goes to planning - Building Design
- Michael Lewis - The End of the Financial World as We Know It
- Interview: She's home from jail, but Lynndie England can't escape Abu Ghraib - The Guardian
- Microfinance’s ‘iron law’ – local economies reduced to poverty
- Consideration of Future Consequences
- Wikileaks Posts Secret Bomb-Stopper Report — Did It Go Too Far?
- Black on Murdoch
- China Fears Restive Migrants As Jobs Disappear in Cities - WSJ.com
Links
- Behind the Numbers
- Center on International Cooperation
- Chris Blattman
- Contingency Today
- Cooperation Commons
- Dan Drezner
- Dan Smith
- Danger Room
- Dani Rodrik
- Democracy in America
- Demos
- DFID blogs
- ECFR
- FCO blogs
- ForeignPolicy.com blog
- Gideon Rachman
- Global Guerrillas
- Guy Yeomans
- Inside Iraq
- Institute for the Future
- Kevin Drum
- Kevin Kelly
- Latino Cambio
- Many to Many
- Mapping Strategy
- Naked Capitalism
- Network Weaving
- New Security Beat
- Open the Future
- Our World 2.0
- Owen Barder
- Oxfam’s From Poverty to Power
- Schneier on Security
- Silobreaker
- Small Precautions
- Small Wars Journal
- Steven Benen
- The Carpetbagger Report
- The Interpreter
- The Politics of Wellbeing
- The Strategist
- The Washington Note
- Worldometers
Tags
Afghanistan bailout banking crisis Belarus cholera Climate Change Crisis democracy dni emission cuts Finance Financial crisis Foreign policy FSB Georgia Iraq Islamic finance Lukashenko Medvedev Merkel mumbai National Security Strategy NATO Obama oil Pakistan Peacekeepers piracy poznan President Bush Putin Resilience Russia Secret services Somalia sovereign wealth funds terrorist attacks Thailand Thaksin transhumanism Twitter Ukraine wikipedia Zimbabwe-
Meta
- John McCain is now in deep trouble - pundits are talking about the election as a done deal.
- He clearly can’t stand Barack ‘that one‘ Obama - and Obama is subtly feeding his anger.
- When cornered, McCain’s instinct is to do something dramatic - pick Palin as VP, suspend his campaign to fight the financial meltdown etc.
- Sarah Palin has haemorrhaged support with mainstream voters, but is building a strong bond with the base. Her main political interest in now in 2012 not 2008.
- The Alaskan legislature will report on the Troopergate mess today and there are signs that the report could be damaging (though not necessarily fatally so).
- Report is published. McCain/Palin campaign let the flames burn for a while (rather than rushing into douse them). Media frenzy builds.
- Tearful Sarah Palin gives press conference to withdraw as VP. Presents herself as the victim of a sexist, elitist media that has drunk the Obama Kool-Aid. Can’t bear to be a distraction any longer, but promises to be back once she’s cleared her name in Alaska.
- A shaken and angry McCain accepts her resignation. The base is in flames. The McCain camp seemingly in disarray.
- A news cycle later - McCain is back with Romney as his new pick for VP. Announces that Romney’s job will be to work exclusively on the fallout from the financial meltdown. He’s the only man with the CV to get the US out of this mess.
- McCain/Romney then run on experience in public, Obama’s character behidn the scenes and through surrogates (all the old stuff - but now also ‘He killed Sarah! The bastard’)
- We all sit back to see whether, this time, the stunt will work.
- Biochar – better than burning sheep - December 15th, 2008
- Dumb kids in charge at State - December 12th, 2008
- The people of Sark "reap what they sow" - democracy in action - December 11th, 2008
- Obama's new energy chief on energy efficiency - December 11th, 2008
- Wikipaedophile latest - December 8th, 2008
- John McCain goes to Canossa
- McCain’s VP on climate
- Do Obama and McCain live in Zakaria’s world?
- The numbers that really matter for McCain
- Vote McCain - for foreign policy expertise
McCain’s next stunt?
October 10, 2008 | David Steven | More on US politics |
Here’s some idle speculation for Friday. Starting points:
Now one would expect the McCain/Palin campaign to tough Troopergate out - after all, they’ve played a pretty ruthless offense so far. But what if McCain wanted to make one last attempt to reclaim the election. Imagine how it might play out…
Will it happen? Probably not. But if it does, you read it here first…
Update: It doesn’t need to be Romney who replaces Palin. Indeed, McCain could pick anyone who he thought would be the most plausible White Knight to ride in and rescue the American (and global) economy. Bloomberg? Greenspan? Anyone who would seem right today and for at least the rest of the month…
Last 5 posts by David Steven
Related posts
Comments
2 Responses to “McCain’s next stunt?”
This Work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Theme created by Brian Gardner modified by River Path






Well, none of the above happened. The findings came out, nobody really cared. Everyone knew she pressured the guy to fire the trooper, but legally she can fire anyone she wants for any reason, or even no reason as the position strictly “serves at the pleasure of the governor”. So, she violated the ethics code but no one cares at all. Her radical-right followers don’t care, the left doesn’t care because they knew all along what the outcome would be. There is no punishment for violating ethics - and a ticket with 0 ethics in the first place can’t get any lower on the ethics scale.
No fireworks, just another blip.
Do you have any plausible speculation as to the North Carolina’s lottery numbers as well?