-
Pages
Authors
Topics
- Africa (81)
- Asia (95)
- Asia Pacific (21)
- Cities (35)
- Climate Change (162)
- Communication (153)
- Conflict and security (241)
- Cooperation and coherence (143)
- Development (112)
- Europe (142)
- Food prices (95)
- Global economy (157)
- Influence (162)
- Latin America (1)
- Leadership (117)
- Maps (20)
- Middle East (125)
- Networks (87)
- News (220)
- Off topic (67)
- Public diplomacy (91)
- Religion in politics (28)
- Resilience (113)
- Russia (29)
- Scarcity (151)
- Technology (59)
- Terrorism (102)
- UK politics (161)
- US politics (240)
- What we're reading (2)
- What we're watching (1)
Archives
Reading List- Noah Millman on ratings agencies
- Willem Buiter: Can the US economy afford a Keynesian stimulus?
- Make Architects' zero carbon scheme for Greenwich goes to planning - Building Design
- Michael Lewis - The End of the Financial World as We Know It
- Interview: She's home from jail, but Lynndie England can't escape Abu Ghraib - The Guardian
- Microfinance’s ‘iron law’ – local economies reduced to poverty
- Consideration of Future Consequences
- Wikileaks Posts Secret Bomb-Stopper Report — Did It Go Too Far?
- Black on Murdoch
- China Fears Restive Migrants As Jobs Disappear in Cities - WSJ.com
Links
- Behind the Numbers
- Center on International Cooperation
- Chris Blattman
- Contingency Today
- Cooperation Commons
- Dan Drezner
- Dan Smith
- Danger Room
- Dani Rodrik
- Democracy in America
- Demos
- DFID blogs
- ECFR
- FCO blogs
- ForeignPolicy.com blog
- Gideon Rachman
- Global Guerrillas
- Guy Yeomans
- Inside Iraq
- Institute for the Future
- Kevin Drum
- Kevin Kelly
- Latino Cambio
- Many to Many
- Mapping Strategy
- Naked Capitalism
- Network Weaving
- New Security Beat
- Open the Future
- Our World 2.0
- Owen Barder
- Oxfam’s From Poverty to Power
- Schneier on Security
- Silobreaker
- Small Precautions
- Small Wars Journal
- Steven Benen
- The Carpetbagger Report
- The Interpreter
- The Politics of Wellbeing
- The Strategist
- The Washington Note
- Worldometers
Tags
Afghanistan bailout banking crisis Belarus cholera Climate Change Crisis democracy dni emission cuts Finance Financial crisis Foreign policy FSB Georgia Iraq Islamic finance Lukashenko Medvedev Merkel mumbai National Security Strategy NATO Obama oil Pakistan Peacekeepers piracy poznan President Bush Putin Resilience Russia Secret services Somalia sovereign wealth funds terrorist attacks Thailand Thaksin transhumanism Twitter Ukraine wikipedia Zimbabwe-
Meta
- Biochar – better than burning sheep - December 15th, 2008
- Dumb kids in charge at State - December 12th, 2008
- The people of Sark "reap what they sow" - democracy in action - December 11th, 2008
- Obama's new energy chief on energy efficiency - December 11th, 2008
- Wikipaedophile latest - December 8th, 2008
- Those foreign policy advisers in full (but where are the women?)
- Down with Hillary
- The Obama NAFTA leak: was it Stephen Harper’s chief of staff?
- Can the Clinton camp quit carping?
- Give Defense to Clinton, not State
What goes around doesn’t come around
December 2, 2008 | David Steven | More on US politics |
Marc Ambinder writes:
So where does Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy cabinet hang its hat for the next four years?
Her main team consists of:Richard Holbrooke, the former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and Dayton Peace Accord broker; Clinton’s chief defense adviser, Bob Einhorn, a Clinton administration veteran and non-proliferation expert, Andrew Shapiro, Clinton’s chief foreign policy adviser, Wendy Sherman, a senior adviser to Madelieine Albright and Warren Christopher, and Melaine Verveer, a former Clinton chief of staff and longtime Clinton confidante.
Now — signing up for Team Obama, especially when things were not looking so hot in late 2007, was a real act of professional courage for many Obamaites. And there was quite a bit of tension between the two camps — although it’s not clear whether the principals listed above were involved.
Tensions have cooled; Clinton advisers are assisting Obama’s transition team and serving on several advisory committees. But staff is destiny, and there are conflicting reports about how much latitude Clinton will have to bring her own team aboard.
I’d say Ambinder underplays the irony of the situation. As Alex noted over a year ago, the Clinton camp let it be known that no foreign policy expert associated with Obama’s primary campaign would be welcome to change sides once Hillary won her inevitable nomination.
Team Clinton has put the word out that the usual process - whereby foreign policy advisers to other candidates are allowed to switch horses as and when their candidate gets eliminated during primary season - has been abolished, at least as far as Hillary as concerned. The ‘you’re with us or against us’ ethos is no longer limited to the GOP, it seems…
Clinton’s people are lucky that their boss’s new boss is a more forgiving type…
Last 5 posts by David Steven
Related posts
Tags
Comments
Comments are closed.






