FCO’s new website

by | May 18, 2008


Oooh… aaah… bow your heads in reverence before the Foreign Office’s brand new website.  Especially nice: this Google maps mashup showing FCO activities around the world (with map pins colour-coded according to the relevant FCO Strategic Priority, if you please). 

All the same, lovely as the new site looks, it could still do with being a lot more interactive.  Sure, we can leave comments on the blogs (although I can’t help but laugh at the description box on the blogging home page, which says

This blog space provides a place for Ministers and officials to engage in a dialogue with you about international affairs and the work of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Reword it in your head as “this blog space provides a place for you to engage in a dialogue with Ministers and officials”, and it somehow sounds entirely different, in a good way…)

But rather than limiting public comments to the blogs (which in any case don’t remotely cover the whole FCO waterfront: they’re fine if you want to talk Kosovo or Lebanon, but there’s nowhere obvious for climate change or UN reform), why not go the whole hog and allow us to comment on every page – and have officials engage in the discussion? 

That would be public diplomacy.

Author

  • Alex Evans is founder of Larger Us, which explores how we can use psychology to reduce political tribalism and polarisation, a senior fellow at New York University, and author of The Myth Gap: What Happens When Evidence and Arguments Aren’t Enough? (Penguin, 2017). He is a former Campaign Director of the 50 million member global citizen’s movement Avaaz, special adviser to two UK Cabinet Ministers, climate expert in the UN Secretary-General’s office, and was Research Director for the Business Commission on Sustainable Development. Alex lives with his wife and two children in Yorkshire.


More from Global Dashboard

Let’s make climate a culture war!

Let’s make climate a culture war!

If the politics of climate change end up polarised, is that so bad?  No – it’s disastrous. Or so I’ve long thought. Look at the US – where climate is even more polarised than abortion. Result: decades of flip flopping. Ambition under Clinton; reversal...