<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McChrystal overruns the civilians (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globaldashboard.org/2010/06/22/mcchrystal-overruns-the-civilians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globaldashboard.org/2010/06/22/mcchrystal-overruns-the-civilians/</link>
	<description>Global risks and how to respond to them, edited by Alex Evans and David Steven</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: c ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.globaldashboard.org/2010/06/22/mcchrystal-overruns-the-civilians/comment-page-1/#comment-25532</link>
		<dc:creator>c ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globaldashboard.org/?p=14499#comment-25532</guid>
		<description>Forgive more geriatric stirring about a subject i know very little about, but, well, presumably McChrystal was appointed because of his confidence and candour - so perhaps his reflections can be taken in that light, ie, helpful feedback?  
 
more important is whether the coin strategy is working. 
 
seems to me that a careful distinction needs to be drawn between what &quot;upsets&quot; civilians and what physically harms them or the soldiers. the latter, i would argue needs to be focused on. it may be unpopular, but i believe people co-operate more with strategies that are recognised as including consistent, understandable measures to protect their physical welfare. perhaps cultural/social considerations will have to be eschewed more. 
 
from an employer&#039;s perspective, it may be that McChrystal could do with a break (ie holiday) ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive more geriatric stirring about a subject i know very little about, but, well, presumably McChrystal was appointed because of his confidence and candour &#8211; so perhaps his reflections can be taken in that light, ie, helpful feedback?  </p>
<p>more important is whether the coin strategy is working. </p>
<p>seems to me that a careful distinction needs to be drawn between what &quot;upsets&quot; civilians and what physically harms them or the soldiers. the latter, i would argue needs to be focused on. it may be unpopular, but i believe people co-operate more with strategies that are recognised as including consistent, understandable measures to protect their physical welfare. perhaps cultural/social considerations will have to be eschewed more. </p>
<p>from an employer&#039;s perspective, it may be that McChrystal could do with a break (ie holiday) &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

