Global Dashboard

« Brown’s reshuffle | Home | New York Times op-ed page needs new fact-checker, possibly with Balkan experience »

Hutton and the new defence agenda

October 3, 2008 | by Charlie Edwards | More on UK | No comments

As news of Hutton’s new role as Defence Secretary travels across Politics Home, Twitter and email a few quick thoughts:

Next week John Hutton will face his first test as Defence Secretary when he walks down Whitehall to Parliament for a debate on Defence in the World. Given his new brief, politicians from across the floor may be gentle in their questions and speeches. Some people may even advise him that he should stay away and let Bob Ainsworth do the job. But this would be bad idea.

The MoD is not in a great place right now, morale is low, there is no strategic direction and people are exhausted. Unlike Browne, Hutton has to show commitment right from the start. On Sunday, having spoken to senior officials he should board a plane and visit Iraq and Afghanistan. There he should listen to senior commanders, FCO and DFID personnel, get up to speed with what’s happening on the ground and give a short pep talk to the troops before coming home. When the debate comes around next week he should enter the chamber and let it be known there are three things he cares about in his new brief - people, people, people.

Back in Main Building things won’t be so easy. There are three key things he will need to focus on. First: Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. As has been reported in the French press - not all is well in Helmand - and while the people on the ground are the one’s who will stabilise the situation, getting a grip on Whitehall is as just as important.

Second: Strategy – Main Building is rudderless, that said there is hope in the shape of a new Director of Strategy, and a new head of policy & planning is also on the way. Coupled to this political consensus on a strategic review is close to reaching a tipping point – all parties publicly and privately now agree that a a review must happen, but when? With limited time until a General Election it may not be in the best interests politically and organisationally to kick a big review off now, instead it would be better to prepare the ground work. Laying the foundations is crucial and should never be underestimated. It may be a thankless task but Hutton will get kudos for doing it.

Third: Strategic Communications. Forget we are staring into an economic abyss for a moment and the other important issue the British Government is dealing with today are the conflicts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the fragile peace in Iraq and general instability in East Africa and elsewhere. And yet no one is entirely sure what we are doing and why these places are important. For reasons best known to the MoD senior commanders and officials don’t seem to be able to get their message out – this may be down to personal, bureaucratic and organisational interests but this needs to be corrected in days not weeks – the British public need to know what their armed forces are doing abroad and how it connects to issues like terrorism at home. Newspaper features on our men and women [insert country/ operation here] isn’t a sustainable policy. If Hutton is feeling bold he should copy No.10 and the FCO and overhaul the entire of MoD’s communications - website and all.

And what about procurement? This may prove, in time, to be Hutton’s Achilles heel. His constituency is home to a major defence contractor (BAE Systems) so it may be advisable to steer clear of procurement issues to begin with. He will have enough on his plate with savings that still need to be found, projects and platforms given the chop - a bit more transparency around the MoD budget wouldn’t go a miss either (but perhaps save this for another day). He should learn from US SecDef Bob Gates who has been weaving a completely new approach in the Pentagon and set the context and narrative first before doing anything major on procurement. After all - the question that has been buzzing around Main Building for the last couple of years is relatively straight forward: what is defence for?



Related posts

  1. The Politics of British Defence
  2. Sshh! European Defence is back on the agenda
  3. UK Defence: A crisis of leadership & strategy
  4. Strategic myopia: the case of UK defence
  5. Britain’s badly configured air force

Comments are closed.

Browse the archives

Key Posts

Pakistan, Kilcullen, Evans - a reply to David Miliband

Do we know what we’re trying to achieve in Pakistan?

Read more » | Comments Off

More on African land deals

Article on rich-country land acquisitions in Africa

Read more » | Comments Off

New report on international institutions and climate change

New report by Alex Evans and David Steven exploring the future international institutional requirements for managing climate change.

Read more » | 1 Comment

The self-resilient society

In a brittle society, we need radical action to build a “Resilient Nation” - so argues a new pamphlet for Demos, by Charlie Edwards.

Read more » | Comments Off

Time to dump 0.7

Why does 0.7 remain so central to the development debate, given that it was arbitrary even when it was agreed… forty years ago?

Read more » | 4 Comments

Peak Emissions Now

Why wait until 2015? Let’s declare 2009 the high watermark for global greenhouse gas emissions.

Read more » | 2 Comments

The peacekeeping crisis in numbers

What happens when you authorise peacekeeping missions - but don’t have the troops to deliver.

Read more » | Comments Off

After the crunch: more urbanisation or less?

Consensus may be growing that the credit crunch spells the end of suburbia - but will what comes next involve more urbanisation, or less?

Read more » | 4 Comments

Calendar

October 2008
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031