Global Dashboard

« The value of democracy? | Home | National Security Top Trumps »

The UK’s national security forum: Progress update

July 23, 2008 | by Charlie Edwards | More on Conflict and security, Cooperation and coherence, UK | No comments

Tucked away in a Written Ministerial Statement yesterday comes news of progress on the UK’s national security forum:

Core group: The forum will have a core group of 12 publicly appointed members reflecting the broad range of the subject areas in the national security strategy. It is likely to include people with a range of experience and expertise in these issues (see below);

A register of associates: and in addition to this core group the Government will create a register of up to 100 expert associates will be who could be called upon to provide advice in specific areas.

Purpose: The purpose of the forum will be to provide expert advice to the National Security Committee (Cabinet Committee on National Security, International Relations and Development (NSID)).

Interestingly the NSF will be set up as a non-departmental public body, for the moment however, the Government will be establishing an interim forum in the early Autumn with members appointed on advice from the Cabinet Office. The Chair of the interim body will be announced shortly.

Role: The forum will be invited to focus on the published strategy to inform the annual updates, although it will be able to commission its own research subject to agreement of its programme by NSID.

The national security forum will be supported by a new national security secretariat in the Cabinet Office.

Alongside that, a horizon scanning unit will be established which will co-ordinate the security-related horizon scanning currently undertaken in a number of Government Departments, with the intention of giving it an overarching framework and a more coherent output.

The Government will also create (in consultation with select committees) a Joint Committee on the national security strategy comprising the Chairs of the key departmental Select Committees with an interest in national security, and other Members of Parliament and Peers with particular interests or experience.

The National Risk Register will be published shortly - its purpose will be to:

give the public information about risks to the UK from natural disasters, accidents and malicious threats over the next five years so that those who wish to can prepare for the consequences.

And there’s more after the jump.

Finally I’ve spotted this - another Ministerial statement this time regarding Adam Ingram’s review of the MoD’s counter-terrorism and resilience capabilities. You will be relieved to hear that:

The study provides a thorough analysis of defence’s role and of the capabilities it brings to bear in support of the Government’s counter-terrorism strategy-CONTEST—and domestic resilience. It reinforces a central theme of the National Security Strategy—that security threats and hazards are intertwined, with no simple distinctions between defence and wider security, and domestic and overseas considerations. It endorses the direction in which the Government are moving the security agenda and it makes a number of recommendations as to how defence could further refine its support in these important areas… phew!



Related posts

  1. National Security Forum - who would you choose?
  2. National Security ‘09: On your marks, get set…
  3. Blueprint for a Tory National Security Reform
  4. National Security Top Trumps
  5. Shaking up Australian national security

Comments are closed.

Browse the archives

Key Posts

Pakistan, Kilcullen, Evans - a reply to David Miliband

Do we know what we’re trying to achieve in Pakistan?

Read more » | Comments Off

More on African land deals

Article on rich-country land acquisitions in Africa

Read more » | Comments Off

New report on international institutions and climate change

New report by Alex Evans and David Steven exploring the future international institutional requirements for managing climate change.

Read more » | 1 Comment

The self-resilient society

In a brittle society, we need radical action to build a “Resilient Nation” - so argues a new pamphlet for Demos, by Charlie Edwards.

Read more » | Comments Off

Time to dump 0.7

Why does 0.7 remain so central to the development debate, given that it was arbitrary even when it was agreed… forty years ago?

Read more » | 4 Comments

Peak Emissions Now

Why wait until 2015? Let’s declare 2009 the high watermark for global greenhouse gas emissions.

Read more » | 2 Comments

The peacekeeping crisis in numbers

What happens when you authorise peacekeeping missions - but don’t have the troops to deliver.

Read more » | Comments Off

After the crunch: more urbanisation or less?

Consensus may be growing that the credit crunch spells the end of suburbia - but will what comes next involve more urbanisation, or less?

Read more » | 4 Comments

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031