The end of unfettered capitalism (or is it?)

Back in September 2002, I wrote a cover story for Euromoney called ‘The End of Unfettered Capitalism’. I interviewed various wise sages of finance (Joseph Stiglitz, George Soros, er…Ann Pettifor) who opined to me of the end of neo-liberalism and the need for a new economic model.

Back then, in the aftermath of Enron and the bursting of the internet bubble, the financial press was full of soul-searching and chest-beating articles, usually by John Plender, wondering where free market capitalism had gone wrong and where it was heading.

My article was the culmination of two years of quiet guerilla warfare against free market finance, which I had waged since becoming a financial journalist after university. I secretly hated the free market, which I blamed for frustrating my desire to be a Sixties-style creative hippy. So I spent most of my time writing articles trying to find chinks in the armour of international finance, as an exercise in self-liberation…

It was quite fun to do this, while working at Euromoney – perhaps the arch-organ of international capital. And it was pretty easy to do, in 2000-2002, while financial markets were imploding.

But then, you know what happened? Firstly, I started to find proper outlets for my frustrated hippy creativity, so I became less of an emotional malcontent (one wonders how much radical criticism emerges as much from the emotional maladjustment of the critic as from the political maladjustment of their society); and secondly, I started to realize that actually private financial markets worked quite well, and the people who criticized them – people like Ann Pettifor, for example, or John Pilger, or Noreena Hertz – were by no means experts about the financial systems they criticized. (more…)

Number 10: how they are related

No10_organogram

Red Box has found this in PR Week: an organogram of Downing Street’s comms operation.  The resolution’s not very good (big version here), but one thing is very clear: Stephen Carter is above everyone else.  As Red Box comments, “It would take a huge amount of insider knowledge to put such a thing together without any sort of briefing. Clearly someone helped.”  And, Red Box wonders, “how do the others on this graphic feel about it?”.

 Well, here’s a starter for ten: Spencer Livermore, who’s been a special adviser to Brown forever, quit yesterday

(more…)

Commodities set to tumble – but don’t breathe a sigh of relief on food prices just yet

As the dollar, together with US equity and bond markets, continue an apparently inexorable slide downards, everyone’s been piling into safety – and especially into commodities.  But as David Roche comments, “With global equity market capitalisation almost 10 times the notional value of commodity derivatives, the rush to commodities by investors has been like squeezing a quart into a pint pot.”

Opinion has been split on how much of the buoyancy in commodity prices is due to this short term price bubble; Martin Wolf, for instance, argued a couple of weeks ago that “Speculation seems not to be that important. If it were, inventories would be soaring. But they are not.”  Still, that was then, and this is now – after the collapse of Bear Stearns, when the flight to safety looks more like a panic rush.

David Roche’s argument, though, is that the commodities bubble will prove short term because global recession will take the heat out of demand for commodities – for “contrary to received wisdom, economic decoupling [between the US and emerging economies] is unlikely.”  Well, he may well be right about the decoupling, at any rate; Nouriel Roubini has also been saying so for a while, and he’s been pretty accurate so far.

So if the world does hit a serious downturn, and if commodity prices do take a tumble as a result, does that mean we can all relax about food prices?  Not for long.  Here’s why.

(more…)