Global Dashboard

« FCO briefs against DFID. Sigh… | Home | Too much globalisation - or not enough? »

Sharia law in UK ‘inevitable’ - Archbishop of Canterbury

February 7, 2008 | by Alex Evans | More on Conflict and security, UK | No comments

Rowan Williams has just been on The World At One to say that in his view, sharia law will become inevitable in parts of the UK.  The interview is in advance of a speech he’s giving this evening, in which he’ll call for Muslims to be able to choose, in some circumstances (such as divorce proceedings) whether UK or sharia law would apply.  Muslims, he continues, should not have to choose between cultural and state loyalty.  You can listen to the full interview here.

As ever, when you actually listen to what he says, he comes across as thoughtful, considered and nuanced; he points, for instance, to the fact that Orthodox Jewish courts already exist in the UK.  But I can’t help wondering whether this is a pretty bad error of judgement in communication terms.  Even the BBC’s own coverage of the story on BBC News Online loses most of the nuances; I’ve listened to the whole interview, and I’m not sure that I fully understand where Williams is going with this. 

The risk here is that what would have been fine as an article in Prospect, say, or the London Review of Books, ignites a firestorm by dint of appearing first on a broadcast medium, followed by immediate pickup on the internet. Just wait for the reactions from the US right wing blogosphere to roll in as they gleefully take this as confirmation of all their predictions about dhimmitude. It’s the “unavoidable” bit that’ll really drive the story.  They’re going to have a hard few days’ work in the Lambeth Palace press office…

Update: the reactions are now rolling in.  Here’s the conservative blog Man in a Shed:

Lets be clear this will in effect create two states with two systems of law occupying the same land. That is not a recipe for healing communal strife - its the recipe for civil war. We need to be a common people who are ruled, protected and equal under a common law regardless of race or creed. Those who don’t like our laws should enter politics to change them by consent or leave. This system of setting up parallel courts was the precursor to Irish partition and the decades of war that followed.



Related posts

  1. The teddy bear incident: a triumph for moderates
  2. Brand Bhutto
  3. Muslims inbred - but did he say it?

Comments are closed.

Browse the archives

Key Posts

Pakistan, Kilcullen, Evans - a reply to David Miliband

Do we know what we’re trying to achieve in Pakistan?

Read more » | Comments Off

More on African land deals

Article on rich-country land acquisitions in Africa

Read more » | Comments Off

New report on international institutions and climate change

New report by Alex Evans and David Steven exploring the future international institutional requirements for managing climate change.

Read more » | 1 Comment

The self-resilient society

In a brittle society, we need radical action to build a “Resilient Nation” - so argues a new pamphlet for Demos, by Charlie Edwards.

Read more » | Comments Off

Time to dump 0.7

Why does 0.7 remain so central to the development debate, given that it was arbitrary even when it was agreed… forty years ago?

Read more » | 4 Comments

Peak Emissions Now

Why wait until 2015? Let’s declare 2009 the high watermark for global greenhouse gas emissions.

Read more » | 2 Comments

The peacekeeping crisis in numbers

What happens when you authorise peacekeeping missions - but don’t have the troops to deliver.

Read more » | Comments Off

After the crunch: more urbanisation or less?

Consensus may be growing that the credit crunch spells the end of suburbia - but will what comes next involve more urbanisation, or less?

Read more » | 4 Comments

Calendar

February 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829